Updates

34th national book awards (national museum, manila)

I had fun at the National Book Awards–and not just because my novel, Dwellers, received an award, or that my publisher, Visprint Inc., won Publisher of the Year, or that the awarding was held in the beautiful Old Senate Hall, but because I was able to spend time with my favorite people. And also, there was food.

On the way to the venue.

34th National Book Awards

There were seating arrangements! I was on the front row. I told J to sit next to me, but he squirmed and felt awkward and eventually moved to the back.

34th National Book Awards

34th National Book Awards

The last time a corsage was pinned on me was in college. :) X number of years ago.

34th National Book Awards

34th National Book Awards

The ceremony opened with the Singkil, performed by the Ramon Obusan Folkloric Group and National Book Award-winning author Kanami Namiki (Ramon Obusan, Philippine Folkdance and Me, Anvil Publishing).

Photos below from the NBDB Facebook page.

FB_IMG_1449636602621

FB_IMG_1449636235249

FB_IMG_1449636216802

Here’s the citation from the National Book Awards: “Speculative fiction works best when the transition from the real world of the reader into the fictive universe of the author is seamless. Under the masterful hand of Eliza Victoria, we are drawn into a mystery, as two people find themselves forced to deal with circumstances beyond their uncanny abilities. Deftly written with elements of horror and suspense, Dwellers is a more than worthy addition to the growing Philippine literature of the fantastic.”

Photos from Dean Alfar:

FB_IMG_1449319738983

FB_IMG_1449319731552

The trophies were made by Lawin Abueva, son of National Artist Napoleon Abueva.

FB_IMG_1449319719908

We climbed onstage with Ms. Nida Ramirez to receive the Publisher of the Year award. Cheers!

2015-12-12_01-02-31

Publisher of the Year Award

CITATION: Hindi matatawaran ang galing ng Visprint, Inc., sa pagpili ng mga aklat na makakaaliw sa mambabasa habang itinataas ang antas ng pag-unawa nito sa mga pangyayari sa ating bansa. Hindi lamang pagpili, kundi paghubog ng mga manunulat, pagpapalawak ng merkado, at pagsakay sa takbo ng sensibilidad ng taumbayan. Marami at malalim at mapangahas ang mga inilathala ng Visprint sa nakaraang taon.

And here’s Ms. Nida’s speech:

Labing apat na taon na po ang nakalipas nang unang tumuntong ang Visprint sa larangan ng book publishing.

Dahil naglakas loob na magtiwala si Bob Ong sa kabila ng zero experience namin–kakayahan sa pagiimprenta lamang po ang aming pinanghahawakan–at sa pangakong personal siyang magbabahay-bahay upang ilako ang kanyang libro, sakaling tanggihan ng major bookstores, sinuong namin ang masalimuot na mundong ito. Bob Ong, kahit hindi mo itinuloy ang pagbabahay-bahay, ni ayaw mo ngang magpakita. Pero dahil sa ‘yo ay nabuksan ang napakalaking pinto para sa maraming manunulat, para sa iyo ang award na ito.

Sa mga bossing namin na pikit mata at bukas bulsang nagtiwala sa mga proyektong pinasok namin, Sir Nido at Sir Efren, para sa inyo ang award na ito.

Sa mga manunulat, lalo na sa UVAS (ang United Visprint All Stars), sa patuloy na pagtitiwala sa Visprint ng inyong mga obra, at sa pakikiisa sa ating mga misyon–You make Visprint look soo darn good! Para sa inyo ang award na ito.

Sa mambabasang Pilipino, maraming maraming salamat po. DAHIL SA INYO ang award na ito.

Sa NBDB [National Book Development Board] at MCC [Manila Critics’ Circle], sa pagpapatamis ng aming paghihirap, maraming salamat po.

 

With Manix Abrera (14, Kikomachine Komix), Tepai Pascual (Maktan 1521) and Kyra Ballesteros hiding behind a clutch.

34th National Book Awards

Messing with the photo wall. Photo from National Book Award nominee, Karl de Mesa (Radiant Void).

FB_IMG_1449351739247

The National Book Award trophy as a very heavy clutch.

34th National Book Awards

The National Museum at night.

34th National Book Awards

Thank you once again to the NBDB, MCC, Visprint–and my books’ readers, as always.

34th National Book Awards

34th National Book Awards

stories from the filipino readercon 2015

This year’s Filipino Reader Conference was held in De La Salle University. I’ve never been inside the campus. The massive Henry Sy Hall reminded me a bit of Singapore’s National Library.

We weren’t able to leave early enough to catch the Conference opening and the first few panels. I’m not on any panels this year; it felt good to just attend the event as an audience member. (For one thing, I was late but didn’t have conniptions.)

Filipino ReaderCon 2015

Filipino ReaderCon 2015

Filipino ReaderCon 2015

Filipino ReaderCon 2015

We attended the “Supporting the Authors You Love” panel, facilitated by Paolo Chikiamco.

“Supporting the Authors You Love”
It’s tough to make a living from being an author, but many authors have untapped allies in their struggles – their readers. While it’s harder for an author to stand out in this day and age, it is also easier than ever for readers to take a more direct hand in supporting authors. The voices of readers have more sway than ever before. This panel is for readers who want to exercise this power wisely, in supporting authors, both as individuals, and by championing pro-author issues. The panel will also include a response from readers, who will speak with regard to what authors (and publishers) can do to help readers help them.

Panelists: Kim Villanueva, Beverly Siy, Mina V. Esguerra, Tepai Pascual
Facilitator: Paolo Chikiamco

Filipino ReaderCon 2015

Filipino ReaderCon 2015

What can readers do? Personally, just sharing my website link and mentioning my books to friends (with or without a review) already means a lot. There are a lot of books out there; it’s easy to get buried (or be pushed into a dark unseen shelf) and fall into obscurity. A book sometimes does not get sold not because it’s bad, but because LITERALLY no one knows it exists. So if a reader acknowledges that my book exists, that’s already a big deal.

We also attended “Live Reading with Gio Gahol and Rachel Coates hosted by #romanceclass”. This is a live reading of excerpts from local romance novellas, which sparked a discussion between J and I.

(Warning: digression ahead.)

We were trying to figure out why I don’t read as much romance novels as the average attendee in that activity. (Most of the audience members were female.) I told him that most of the romance tropes do nothing for me, most of the time: the lingering looks, the blow-by-blow description of the kiss, the description of the physical male form that caters to an ideal, which is not necessarily my ideal. This may be an effect of my fierce need to protect the personal, as in, Well, that’s nice, but you don’t need to tell me that.

I told J that I probably just demand other things from the romance stories I read. I’m thinking: I didn’t have a high school sweetheart. Or a college sweetheart. (J and I met when we were both already working.) I was a cynical and pragmatic teen, and still probably a cynical and pragmatic adult, so most romance stories to me seem staged. Un-honest. (In case it’s not clear – and before I get hate mail – this is not a criticism of romance and romance writers. This is an exploration of why most novels in the genre does not work for me.) What works for me: humor. Humor, for some reason, always seems honest to me. Or rather, I don’t need to worry about authenticity in something that is funny, so I can relax and just enjoy the story instead of demanding more from it.

We also asked, Is romance a luxury? Most of the stories read had middle-class protagonists. We realized that most of our local romance stories have at least one upper- to middle-class character; either they’re both middle-class or one belongs to a lower class to heighten the dramatic possibilities. If you write a romantic story with poor characters, will that still be labeled “romance”? They will be faced with problems different from the problems faced by middle-class protagonists like where to go get coffee, or what to do about the snotty wedding planner, or what hotel to book for that vacation abroad, or which gym to go to. Without recognizable romance tropes, that story will be labeled “drama”. What if the protagonists live in a war zone? “Drama”. Romance is airy; romance is not cash-strapped. It requires a light hand that can push away the concerns of the world, so the individual can focus on variations of this single question: does he/she love me back? In some scenarios, this question is the least important question to ask. So, is romance/romantic love a luxury?

I’m sure there are more arguments for or against this claim, but for now, moving on!

UPDATE! Following is a(n accidental Facebook) conversation between me, J and Mina Esguerra.

Mina: Eliza Victoria Eee awesome post! Answering here because kalat na sa Twitter.

“If you write a romantic story with poor characters, will that still be labeled “romance”? They will be faced with problems different from the problems faced by middle-class protagonists like where to go get coffee, or what to do about the snotty wedding planner, or what hotel to book for that vacation abroad, or which gym to go to.”

Yes, as these are tropes found specifically in contemporary romance featuring middle class characters, but not in, say, paranormal romance or historical American Western, or historical Regency, or Precious Hearts in some cases, but those have their own tropes as well.

“Romance is airy; romance is not cash-strapped. It requires a light hand that can push away the concerns of the world, so the individual can focus on variations of this single question: does he/she love me back? In some scenarios, this question is the least important question to ask.”

This is, sadly, the generalization of romance that I get most often. (I can say that any reader of romance will say it’s not all airy, that people in romance are also poor, but I’ll step back from that because it’s exhausting.) The thing with romance genre books though is that it pre-supposes that the reader finds this a valid question. Those who don’t, will not read the book. As I do, when I encounter books or entire genres that do not resonate at all. The questions they pose there I understand are important to them though.

“So, is romance/romantic love a luxury?”

Yes — as much a luxury as fantasy, poetry, crime fiction, horror, any fiction is to me. Is there a way to discuss this without inadvertently shaming women for wanting read about love and acknowledging desires? (It’s an actual question! I don’t want to go there. I like discussing romance in a shame-free way.)

Me: Thanks for answering Mina! And yes I have to acknowledge we were discussing contemporary romance. Sumakit ulo namin ni Jaykie while discussing this, we should’ve roped you in. Idea for a panel? Hehehe.

J: Interesting topic ito sakin! Lately kasi I notice stuff that appeals to young women tends to get dismissed (e.g. “mababaw ang AlDub”) and I find it kinda unfair, so ayun mej marami na kami napag-usapan haha

I think where we left off is trying to determine what is considered Romance and what isn’t. I mean, I like Charlie Kaufman movies and I certainly think there’s romantic elements to them, but I don’t think they get categorized as Romance really? Except Eternal Sunshine, but maybe not even that.

Mina: As far as publisher guidelines are concerned, it has to be romance as the A plot, ie main conflict is a threat to the romance, and the climax is a resolution to the romance. Diana Gabaldon’s Outlander books, for example, despite having a lot of romantic elements, do not climax in romance resolution so they are not romance novels, and the author herself won’t call them that. Nicholas Sparks novels, same thing, as those normally resolve the romance and climax at something else (like death). There are structural elements also and beats that have to be met. Many Wattpad to print stories for example are not strictly romances, structurally.

Mina: Chick lit will for example resolve the main character’s dramatic arc often independent of the romance, ie a promotion, validation at work, winning something, so they’re not strictly romances either despite a romance element present.

Mina: Oh and there’s also the romantic suspense subgenre where there’s usually a threat to their lives and the characters are in conflict situations/actual peril, but romance still main plot

Me: Nito ko lang na-gets ang difference ng Chick Lit at Romance! (Some people lump them together, which confuses me!) Salamat!

J: Oh so follow-up question, the resolution could be anything that addresses the indefinite status of the relationship, right? So if the ending is that they decide not to be together it’s still ok?

Mina: Oh but happily ever after is actually a requirement (for many romance publishers) and they won’t accept a submission without it. There’s a debate on this because self publishing, so authors can do what they want and some aren’t ending their stories happily anymore. But then the debate is, what’s the point of this 150 page journey if the answer is no? Did you pull a bait and switch on the reader who had very solid expectations of what they were paying for? The compromise is the “happy for now” which is a decision to stay in a loving monogamous relationship but isn’t a proposal or a wedding

J: Ah, that’s interesting. Ang naisip ko kasi ay baka may story na tipong two people are very much in love, but ultimately they mutually decide the relationship isn’t feasible? But yeah, valid point din na parang bait and switch nga yung ganyang ending

Mina: Eliza – That took me a while din! and I was already writing the books when I figured it out huhu

Mina: Thank you for asking! I like talking about this. grin emoticon The formula and rules naman are being tested a lot and I read the books that are testing it, but hit or miss. I usually don’t enjoy them as much especially if they sacrifice romance for whatever other agenda.

J: Your responses really add some much needed context for me Mina so thanks! Your expertise is very much appreciated. Another follow-up! Are happy endings more a prerequisite of written work, or does it apply to other forms of Romance media? I ask because I think of a number of films that don’t necessarily have happy endings (not even the “happy for now” variety), but I think would still tend to be categorized as romance. An example for me would be Once, which has a romance A plot, and I think does follow the Romance beats consistently (if somewhat more muted), but doesn’t end with a relationship for the two main characters.

In fact I feel like a lot of romantic films written by males tend to follow suit–somewhat more muted expressions of love, coupled with not-necessarily-happy endings. I think I’d place Being John Malkovich under that category, and Woody Allen films also.

Mina:  I haven’t seen Once! I know I should huhu. But I’ve seen Begin Again and if it’s similar (I’ve been told that they are?) I wouldn’t call it romance genre based on the movie I saw. If that were a book it would get backlash in the reviews, and there would be requests for it to be categorized as “Women’s Fiction” or “Contemporary Fiction” instead (if mostly male POV). A romance book written Woody Allen-film-style would get the same response I think.

But yes these will probably be categorized as Romance in other media. I suspect that their creators will often say in interviews that they’re “not just romance” though precisely because they’re getting some backlash for being bland romance. “Muted” romance I wouldn’t call romance at all; if I were into horror I’d think an author who specialized in “mildly scary” just wasn’t being edited by the right people.

Thanks, Mina!

Filipino ReaderCon 2015

Filipino ReaderCon 2015

Also signed some books!

Filipino ReaderCon 2015

A cute calamansi muffin from Chris Mariano, author of Cover (Story) Girl.

Filipino ReaderCon 2015

Filipino ReaderCon 2015

My ReaderCon haul:

Filipino ReaderCon 2015

  • Janus Silang comic book by Carljoe Javier and Natasha Ringor, based on the novel by Edgar Calabia Samar (Anino/Adarna)
  • Likhaan Volume 9, which has a story of mine. Received from Kyra by way of Gabby. Thanks!
  • The Merchant of Venice, from the ReaderCon loot bag
  • Cover (Story) Girl, signed by Chris
  • Mockingjay, from the ReaderCon raffle
  • Ang Subersibo nina Adam David at Mervin Malonzo (Anino/Adarna)
  • Muros #1 by Paolo Chikiamco and Borg Sinaban (Studio Salimbal)
  • The Garbage Artist by Andrew Drilon (Studio Salimbal)
  • Hukbong Sandatahan ng Kahaggardan! by Manix Abrera (Visprint)

Congrats to Honey, Tina, Paolo, Mina and the rest of the ReaderCon committee! It gets bigger every year.

2016 poems + filipino readercon

November’s coming to a close, and I’m ending it with a couple of acceptances, a writers night, and a reader conference.

  • UK-based Neon Literary Magazine will be publishing my poem “What Waits” in a 2016 issue. Thank you to editor Krishan Coupland. You can read a poem of mine here, published in Neon’s 34th issue. You can read Krishan’s interview with me here.
  • Singapore-based Kitaab will be publishing my poem “Tiny Tragedies”. My thanks to poetry editor Desmond Kon.

The 9th Likhaan volume, edited by Luna Sicat-Cleto, Eugene Evasco, Isabela Banzon and Charlson Ong, and which includes my story “The Seventh”, will be launched during Writers Night at the UP Executive House on November 26. Read the details here.

readercon-program-v2

The 5th Filipino ReaderCon will be held this Saturday, November 28 at the Henry Sy Hall, the De La Salle University in Manila. Register here  and check out the panel descriptions here.

‘dwellers’ wins best novel in english at the 34th national book awards + a new poem + #talkflip

Exciting stuff! Dwellers wins Best Novel in English, and Visprint is awarded Publisher of the Year. Thank you to Visprint, the National Book Development Board, the Manila Critics Circle, J and my family, and the little book’s readers for their attention and kindness. Congratulations to all the winners. The full list follows.

Dwellers by Eliza Victoria (Cover)

The National Book Development Board (NBDB) and the Manila Critics Circle (MCC) are pleased to announce the winners of the 34th National Book Awards (NBA). Below is the list of NBA winners for books published in 2014:
LITERARY DIVISION

FICTION CATEGORY – NOVEL
(English Language)

Dwellers, by Eliza Victoria, Visprint, Inc.

FICTION CATEGORY – NOVEL
(Filipino Language)

Si Janus Silang at ang Tiyanak ng Tabon, by Edgar Calabia Samar, Adarna House, Inc.

FICTION CATEGORY – SHORT STORIES
(English Language)

Wonderlust, by Nikki Alfar, Anvil Publishing Inc.

NONFICTION CATEGORY
(English Language)

Ramon Obusan, Philippine Folkdance and Me, by Kanami Namiki, Anvil Publishing, Inc.

ESSAYS CATEGORY
(English Language)

Cherry Blossoms in the Time of Earthquakes and Tsunami, by Rey Ventura, Ateneo de Manila University Press

ESSAYS CATEGORY
(Filipino Language)

iStatus Nation, by Joselito Delos Reyes, Visprint, Inc.

ANTHOLOGY CATEGORY
(English Language)

Agam: Filipino Narratives on Uncertainty and Climate Change, edited by Regina Abuyuan, Institute for Climate and Sustainable Cities

ANTHOLOGY CATEGORY
(Filipino Language)

Ang Labingtatlong Pasaway, by Jun Cruz Reyes, Visprint, Inc.

LITERARY CRITICISM/LITERARY HISTORY CATEGORY
(English Language)

The Postcolonial Perverse vol. 1, by J. Neil C. Garcia, The University of the Philippines Press

LITERARY CRITICISM/LITERARY HISTORY CATEGORY
(Filipino Language)

Talab: Mga Sanaysay sa Wika, Panitikan, at Pagtuturo, by Rebecca T. Añonuevo, Ateneo de Naga University Press

POETRY CATEGORY
(English Language)

Hidden Codex: Fictive Scriptures, by Jose Marte A. Abueg, University of Santo Tomas Publishing House

Time’s Enchantment and Other Reflections, by Marne Kilates, Ateneo de Naga University Press

POETRY CATEGORY
(Philippine Language except Hiligaynon/Kinaray-a)

Kundiman sa Gitna ng Karimlan, by E. San Juan, The University of the Philippines Press

POETRY CATEGORY
(Hiligaynon/Kinaray-a Language)

Tikum Kadlum, by Federico Caballero and Alicia P. Magos, The University of the Philippines Press

GRAPHIC LITERATURE CATEGORY
(English Language)

Rodski Patotski: Ang Dalagang Baby, by Gerry Alanguilan (story) and Arnold Arre (illustration and color), Meganon Comics Publishing House

GRAPHIC LITERATURE CATEGORY
(Filipino Language)

Tabi Po (Volume 1), by Mervin Malonzo, Visprint, Inc.

GRAPHIC LITERATURE CATEGORY
(Wordless)

14 (Silent Comics) by Manix Abrera (writer and illustrator), Visprint, Inc.

TRANSLATION CATEGORY

Manila Synod of 1582: The Draft of Its Handbook for Confessors, translated by Paul A. Dumol, Ateneo de Manila University Press

NON-LITERARY DIVISION

FOOD CATEGORY

Country Cooking, by Michaela Fenix, Anvil Publishing, Inc.

SOCIAL SCIENCES CATEGORY

Rido: Clan Feuding and Conflict Management in Mindanao (expanded edition), by Wilfredo Magno Torres III (editor), Ateneo de Manila University Press

PROFESSIONS CATEGORY

The Adventures of a PR Girl, by Bettina Rodriguez-Olmedo, Anvil Publishing, Inc.

LEISURE CATEGORY

Buti Pa Ang Roma, May Bagong Papa, by Noreen Capili, Anvil Publishing, Inc.

ART CATEGORY

Journey of a Thousand Shuttles, The Philippine Weave, by Norma A. Respicio, National Commission for Culture and the Arts

SCIENCE CATEGORY

Birds of Cebu and Bohol Philippines, by Nilo Arribas Jr., Bobby Kintanar, and Raul Benjamin Puentespina, University of San Carlos Press

HISTORY CATEGORY

Sakdalistas’ Struggle for Philippine Independence, 1930-1945, by Motoe Terami-Wada, Ateneo de Manila University Press

JOURNALISM CATEGORY

Vantage Point: The Sixth Estate and Other Discoveries, by Luis Teodoro, The University of the Philippines Press

DESIGN

Manila Synod of 1582: The Draft of Its Handbook for Confessors, design by Karl Fredrick M. Castro, Ateneo de Manila University Press

LANGUAGE STUDIES

Ambagan 2011: Mga Salita Mula sa Iba’t Ibang Wika sa Filipinas, by Michael M. Coroza and Galileo S. Zafra, The University of the Philippines Press

PUBLISHER OF THE YEAR

Visprint, Inc.

Source: National Book Development Board

Other exciting things:

Live twitter chat eliza victoria

singapore – day three and departure

Read about Day One here.

Read about Day Two here.

Our feet were killing us!

But we grinned and bore it as we proceeded with our last day in Singapore.

We had breakfast at the local branch of Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf inside Bugis+. I love that they gave us a huge mug.

20151108_085222

We checked out early so we could travel to Little India. We took the bus from St. Joseph’s Chapel to get to the Little India station.

Lunch at Apollo Banana Leaf. J remarked that the Indian food here tasted as good as the Indian food we get back home.

20151108_114937

Haji Lane. To get to Haji Lane from Little India, hop on a bus that will stop at Parkview Square and walk. Every bus stop has a map, so finding the right bus won’t be that hard. You can also use this link to plot your way around.

20151108_125842

It’s a narrow street with some cute shops.

20151108_125852

20151108_125922

20151108_125926

20151108_130019

20151108_130038

20151108_130113

Hmm.

20151108_130429

20151108_130550

Back to Changi Airport and then home.
We’ll be back Singapore. (Well, we’d better; thanks to my paranoia and over-budgeting I still have some Singaporean dollars left!)

20151108_155837

While clearing Immigration, an airport personnel read the message on my shirt, “Everything has beauty.”

“It’s true,” she said. “Here you go, beautiful.”

singapore – day two

Read about Day One here.

I woke up early the next morning and was surprised to find that most of the shops were still closed.

Huh.

We ended up having breakfast at a fast food restaurant. (We didn’t know the hawker stalls in Albert Center were nearby and were already open.)

20151107_100529

We checked out the National Library.

20151107_110124

20151107_104807

Here’s the entrance to the Children’s Section.

20151107_105732

20151107_105753

20151107_105800

20151107_110015

After that, the Bras Basah Complex.

20151107_111327

It’s like a nostalgia trip. As in “oh my god remember Childcraft?”

20151107_111714

20151107_111936

Next, the Singapore Art Museum. Entrance is S$10 each.

20151107_113250

20151107_113355

This is my favorite installation: “Raising Spirits and Restoring Souls” by Zulkifle Mahmod, Singapore’s national anthem “distilled to its percussive beat” through speakers placed around the room. I love the use of pipes in this installation. The sound produced by pipes in an old house is the kind of sound you can deny (“don’t worry, it’s just the pipes”).

20151107_113758

20151107_113820

20151107_114625

20151107_115058

A note on Progress.

20151107_114352

Another great installation, “Every Point of View” by Matthew Ngui.

20151107_121224

Stand at a certain point and the message will reveal itself.

20151107_121234

Orchard Road.

20151107_131803

20151107_131916

Laksa once again once more for lunch.

20151107_133631

20151107_151942

This is a shot of the National Library at night. It’s huge! And pretty. #butipasila

20151107_195743

After shopping for pasalubong, we stopped at a Doner Kebab stall at Bugis Village for dinner, S$10 for three kebabs. Yum.

20151107_214553

Day Three!

singapore – day one

Our trip to Singapore became less an exploration of a new place than a meditation of what we’re missing in our own city. We spent a lot of time talking about home and how tired we were that we couldn’t have this. Every conversation must have ended with a sigh and a sad “Buti pa sila”. (Lucky them.) Emerging on Bugis Street from the train, we became very much aware of the nearly deserted streets, the lack of security personnel at the entrance of malls. The humidity and the sun reminded us of Manila but without the chaos of Manila. Singapore is like Manila that turned out right. (But then right is relative; as a tourist — a first-time visitor — I can only comment on Singapore’s skin but not it’s heart.) As a friend mentioned over dinner, it is the little things that will make you stay in Singapore: the fact that you can time the arrival of the bus on your way to work, the fact that you can get on the MRT wearing your backpack and not worry that a fellow passenger will grab your wallet and phone. The little things can make you stay, and it’s also the little things, like splinters, that burrow under your skin and will make you want to leave.

But first:

Ah. Speaking of things that make you want to leave.

NCR Aviation Security Unit chief sacked amid NAIA ‘laglag-bala’ scam

And so we had to do this.

20151105_220718

It made me feel pretty stupid but what can you do.

We flew Cebu Pacific at 5:45 AM on Friday (the plane taxied for sooo long I had to remark, “Are we going to drive all the way to Singapore?”) and arrived at Changi Airport Terminal 2 at 9:20 AM. It was an unremarkable flight, which was great. (I’m not a fan of flying. It was the longest flight I’ve ever been on — I haven’t traveled to the US or Europe — and I was bored.out.of.my.mind. But when flying, boring is good.)

20151106_043048

20151106_093331

Relevant source: Changi Airport Guide

One Singapore dollar is equivalent to around 33 Philippine pesos. We had our money changed at Sanry’s Money Changer before our trip. You can check out this link about the cost of living in Singapore to help you with your budget.

This is mine. I must tell you now that I over-budgeted on nearly every line item. You’ll be comfortable with less than S$200 pocket money.

Sample Budget $15 per meal 9 meals 135
$2 per water bottle 10 water bottles? 20
tourist pass 30
$10 per meal (snacks and coffee) 3 meals 30
Shopping 50
Pasalubong 50
Wiggle room money 50
 TOTAL 365

Our kaya toast meal (kaya toast, soft-boiled eggs, coffee with condensed milk) cost S$4.30 each, to give you an idea.

20151106_100041

From Terminal 2, we headed to the Changi Airport MRT station to buy a 3-day Tourist Pass. The pass, which gives you unlimited access to the buses, MRT and LRT, costs S$30 with a S$10 deposit. Go crazy! Get on and off every station if you feel like it! Just surrender the card and you’ll get your 10 bucks back. Unless you’d like to keep the card as a souvenir.

20151106_135327

There’s no shortage of maps and brochures at the airport. It’s a pretty Type A city. I love it.

20151106_142312

20151106_110702

Relevant source: MRT Map

Getting around is pretty easy. (That’s coming from a girl who gets lost all the time.) To head to the city from Changi Airport, hop on the train heading to Tanah Merah. At Tanah Merah, switch to the East West line (green on the map) on Platform B.

20151106_110725

We got off at Bugis station and checked out Sim Lim Square.

20151106_114332

Sim Lim Square has a guide. Type A, like I said.

20151106_114326

It reminds me of Greenhills.

The store J wanted to check out was still closed, so we had a snack. Sim Lim Square has a food court in the basement.

20151106_121853

20151106_122122

20151106_122405

After that stopover, we walked to get to Victoria Hotel, which was on Victoria Street. I’d like to pretend I own the hotel. (And the street.)

We stopped for lunch in Bugis Village.

Laksaaaa.

20151106_130707

Victoria Hotel has a pretty great location. I recommend it.

We rested for a bit before heading to Gardens by the Bay to meet with Victor and Patricia, who have been working and living in Singapore for 15 years.

Remember when I said just a few paragraphs ago that I get lost all the time? So yeah, I got lost here. We have been waiting at the wrong ticket counter for 30 minutes until J realized, Maaaaybe there’s another ticket counter?

Sorry for the wait, Victor.

While lost, I snapped these shots:

20151106_165842

20151106_170003

20151106_170136

Victor took us on a tour of the two domes in the Gardens — the Flower Dome and the Cloud Forest (S$28 for both domes, but Victor generously paid for our entrance fees: “Ken Liu [who attended the Singapore Writers Festival] wanted to go to the hawker stalls. I spent five dollars on Ken Liu.” So now I can say I’m more expensive than Ken Liu. Hooray?).

Victor said most of his friends from Asia prefer the Flower Dome, while Europeans more often than not prefer the Cloud Forest.

He was right. We loved the Flower Dome more.

(And to think we nearly skipped this!)

20151106_175124

20151106_175428

20151106_175737

I love the color of these deep purple flowers.

20151106_175748

20151106_180450

Weird cactus.

20151106_181413

Hello, Little Prince.

20151106_181638

I love the shape of this cactus.

20151106_181930

I forgot the name of this flower, but it smells like rot.

20151106_182321

Another strange flower.

20151106_182428

20151106_182524

Not a very good shot of a very tall cactus.

20151106_182959

I wish I knew more about plants! Victor knew a great deal about flowers and vegetables, which was a pleasant surprise.

20151106_184826

2015-11-09_07-08-56

20151106_205747

20151106_215247

We had dinner and fun conversation at Supertree Dining. (J is still dreaming of that plum juice.)

Thank you Victor and Patricia!

20151106_224021

Day Two!