10 succinct reasons to watch ‘iron man 3’

  1. Ben Kingsley
  2. Rebecca Hall, who proves, once and for all, that the Pepper Potts character (played by Gwyneth Paltrow) is boring.
  3. “Are you going to leave me here like my Dad?” “…Yes.” AKA the big guy/little guy relationship that could have been Hollywood-sappy but wasn’t.
  4. Robert Downey, Jr. I wasn’t too moved by the dramatic scenes, but RDJ, as always, nailed the comedy. I can’t imagine Tony Stark being played by anyone else.
  5. In order to wash away the bad taste left behind by the second movie.
  6. In order to pretend the second movie did not exist.
  7. Ben Kingsley
  8. Ben Kingsley
  9. The skydiving scene
  10. The skydiving scene, because how the hell did they shoot that?

Watch it!

HTS0080_v001.1052_R.JPG

a separation

A-Separation

A Separation is a 2011 Iranian film by Asghar Farhadi. It won the Academy Award and the Golden Globe for Best Foreign Language film in 2012, and is included in Roger Ebert‘s top ten films of 2011. This film is set in modern-day Iran; Simin, the wife, wants to take her family abroad to find better opportunities for their 11-year-old daughter, but Nader is having doubts about leaving, not wanting to leave behind his senile father. The film opens with the couple in divorce court. Iran is a nation run by the rules of Islamic law, and the law says that Simin can’t do anything without the permission of her husband. So, she says, she will just divorce him. However, the law also says that their daughter cannot go anywhere without the father’s permission. Enraged, Simin leaves their home and goes to her mother. Nader then hires a pregnant woman named Razieh to take care of his father. Islamic law says that a woman cannot work in a house with only the man present, so Razieh doesn’t tell her husband. She is so religious that she has to ask if it is a sin to change an old man’s soiled underpants. And I’m going to end the summary here because you really really need to see this incredible film.

What do we know about Iran, really? What pictures and notions we have are caricatures from Western cinema and various propaganda. Subservient women and bearded men, camels and the desert and the war. And yet A Separation opens with Simin fighting Nader, and Nader feeling not power as a man in a patriarchal nation, but helplessness. I love this one scene where Nader tells his daughter to get the change back at the gas station. He watches his 11-year-old daughter arguing with the proprietor on the rear-view mirror, and he smiles to himself, as if to say, That’s my girl.

The film shows an Iran trying to live with its various rules, but sometimes, as Roger Ebert said in his review, “the law is not adequate to deal with human feelings.”

weekend reviews

Flight flight-movie-denzel-washington

Flight has probably the most frightening plane emergency scene I’ve ever seen onscreen, but this is just a small portion of the film. It’s a film of “almosts”: Capt. Whip Whitaker (played by the magnificent Denzel Washington) was just about to land when disaster hit, he was just about to give up drinking and drugs and turn his life around when the investigation started, he was just about to – But we are entering spoiler territory. This film is more than two hours long, but you stay till the end because of the “almosts”. And it’s a great character study. You can’t predict this drunk, coked-up flight genius, but he has your sympathies. You want to see if Whip will do things right, this time.

Game Change

game-change-julianne-moore-ed-harris

This is a surprisingly good dramatization of the 2008 McCain-Palin campaign. Everyone, especially Sarah Palin (played by Julianne Moore, who deserves all the awards), comes across not as caricatures, but as people. People who get thrown into the circus of politics in the time of YouTube and SNL, and who slowly break under the pressure of a presidential race that they can never win. Good pacing, good dialogue – the two-hour run didn’t feel at all like two hours.

Sinister

film-review-sinister.jpeg1-1280x960

I am in desperate need of a good horror film. I don’t know why I even bothered to watch this. The musical score, instead of heightening the experience, just got in the way. The frights are corny. The film features families dying of horrible deaths, but I can’t shake off the feeling that I am just watching a movie, that they all got the noose off their necks after the take and they went out for hotdogs with the crew afterwards.  How will that scare you, or make you think? A good horror film removes you from your context. This 90-minute film felt like a three-hour film, I was so bored.

killing them softly + django unchained

Killing Them Softly

Killing-Them-Softly-Brad-Pitt-Richard-Jenkins

America is in the throes of economic collapse. Bush is introducing the bailout, and McCain and Obama are advocating change in the next presidential election. Even the mobsters are feeling the recession. Jackie (Brad Pitt) wants to fly in a hitman, but he has to fly coach. The “recession price” for killing a person has gone down to 10 grand a pop. This film, written and directed by Andrew Dominik (Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford) has the saddest hitmen I know. Storytelling is tight and the visuals are realistic. This is not your flashy shoot-em-up, but the dialogues – funny and cynical – will reel you in.

Django Unchained

django-unchained-2

I’ve seen this film a while ago but never got the chance to write down my thoughts. It’s a great film, and you should see it. Tarantino is definitely getting better. We can talk about racism and slavery in a cerebral way, but this film says fuck you to that. It forces you to look and dwell in the fantasy (like the fantasy of Hitler dying in Inglorious Basterds); it’s like a punch in the gut.

PS Christoph Waltz is fantastic here!

TV: Happy Endings is a light, fun watch. (Dramaaaa! I see the show on TV but only recently got the chance to watch the first two episodes in full.) Raising Hope is still sweet and sadly still underrated. Watch it, people! House of Lies with Don Cheadle is okay, but I’m not sure if I’ll watch Episode 2 onwards. The first episode of Vikings starts strangely (cliche scenes, dialogue that’s not appropriate to the time period) but gets interesting. Might follow that.

HappyEndings1x01_0019

What have you been watching?

the haneke series: la pianiste (2001)

LaPianiste

Coming out of the haze and chill of Haneke’s “The Glaciation Trilogy“, his 2001 offering, La Pianiste (The Piano Teacher) feels like a walk in the park. Straightforward plot, strange but decipherable characters. Oh, I’m sure you’ve heard your share of stories of repressed individuals who turn out to have the most disgusting sexual fantasies. This is an intense character study of such an individual. Erika is a piano teacher who shares an apartment (and a bedroom) with her domineering mother, and one day meets a student who is attracted to her. Isabelle Huppert is amazing here. You wouldn’t want to cross her.

the haneke series: 71 fragments of a chronology of chance (1994)

image

In the third and final film in his Glaciation Trilogy, Haneke leaves the family sphere and looks at several unrelated characters. Of the three films, 71 Fragments, though still clinical and unattached in its presentation of events, is the most emotional and accessible, featuring characters who could very well be a neighbor or a relative. It shows the degradation of communication in an age when we have all the communication devices we can ever need, our isolation despite the opportunities to connect. I was very much taken by that scene featuring the old man living on his own, talking on the phone with his daughter and granddaughter. It was a “nine-minute, fully scripted” dialogue, but we can only hear the old man, alternately sweet and cruel.

Like the other two films, 71 Fragments also takes a look at the bourgeoisie. Nothing can be more middle-class than stress during Christmas, and altercations at a bank, and how adherence to rules can sometimes make us hoard what little kindness we can impart. When the student, desperate to get money to pay his gas so he could stop blocking the gas station, is turned away “because there is a line”, what happens next makes the bank teller’s and bank customers’ firm stand comical and worthless. What’s a few seconds to spare for a young man so clearly tired, so clearly in need of help? He only wants 300 schillings from his own bank account.

The Austin Film Society quotes Haneke in this entry:

This style of fragmenting his story is in purposeful opposition to “mainstream cinema,” which is peopled by writer/directors who give the impression of knowing everything [about their characters and their situations]. Haneke rails against filmmakers who imply that a character is simply a certain way [a one-dimensionally good or bad person]. Haneke says passionately, “A character is never just this. It’s also that. And all these alsos are often contradictory. That’s what makes life so rich and also irritating. It’s irritating in a work [of art] because we’re used to always having the answer to why someone is like that.”

“You should always rebel against what’s wrong, against evil. You can rebel against that in film by showing it in a way that gives you a desire for the alternative, not in a way that makes it consumable. Dramatic art has never agreed with the status quo.”

Be kind, goddamn it.

the haneke series: the seventh continent (1989), benny’s video (1992)

Seventh Continent

benny

So after seeing Caché (2005) recently, and realizing that I am fascinated with Michael Haneke’s stories and directing style, I decided to devote some time to watching his films. All of them, in order, if possible. 

The Seventh Continent and Benny’s Video are the first two films in Haneke’s so-called “Glaciation Trilogy”, which deals with “emotional glaciation”. It’s such a beautiful, concrete, spot-on term describing the unknowable malaise that affect the families in these two films, slowly but surely stripping them of life. The Seventh Continent in my opinion is the superior of the two, beginning with a shot of a family sitting inside their vehicle in a car wash. What is more pointless than sitting inside a car that is being washed by a machine? Why not just step out and do chores, read a book, enjoy the sunlight? But the family members themselves are like machines, and we feel the deadening effect of their days as we watch them prepare meals, go to work, go to school, eat breakfast, pay at the cashier. If they are happy doing these things we do not know, because Haneke frames the shots in such a way that we only see their torsos. Maybe their eyes are so dead that they are not worth filming. The repetitive shots of cashiers’s fingers typing the prices of the objects they buy at the grocery – like all the other shots that seem so pointless and yet such a part of our own daily lives – become meaningful and sad in hindsight, after we witness the third act. Anne, the mother, only shows emotion in the grocery after the decision (I must not tell you); when the grocer asks, “Are you having a lot of people over?”, Anne bites into a piece of chocolate, her face bright, suddenly so full of life and purpose, and says no.

The brilliance of The Seventh Continent must have spoiled me, because I felt nothing for Benny’s Video. I love the clinical precision of the cinematography, but – and this is disturbing to say – it’s supposed to be shocking but it no longer shocks me, having been shocked by Haneke before. Benny is a 14-year-old boy who is so in love with videos that he’d rather watch a live video feed of the street outside rather than look out of the window. It’s about disconnected youth, a well-off family who only looks closer when something horrible happens, but these are topics that have been tackled before in cinema and elsewhere. I was hoping the film could give me some new insight, but instead it shows a boy watching violent films and listening to metal. (Although one can argue that Benny is a born psychopath attracted to violent media.) It felt too simplistic, and said nothing new to me.